Posted

Recently on social media I read posts and comments that attempted to obfuscate the truth concerning the attack on the civil liberties of former President Donald Trump’s lawyer. The third lawyer connected to Donald Trump to have their personal communications seized under a federal search warrant by FBI agents was Rudy Giuliani on April 28, 2021.

In the interview below, Mr. Giuliani retells the story of the agents pounding on his door early in the morning and showing a search warrant for ‘all electronics.’ Almost all the electronic devices were confiscated, including someone else’s cell phone. Before the agents left without picking up all the electronic devices, Giuliani indicated they were leaving two hard drives (which are ‘electronic devices.’) When told the hard drives were copies of the hard drive from Hunter Biden’s laptop left in a repair shop, the agents refused to take them. Did I mention Mr. Giuliani had also offered to freely provide the information prior to the execution of the search warrant?

So, the comments on social media indicated Rudy Giuliani was muddle-headed because he used the term ‘laptop’ when referring to the hard drives. Everything could be dismissed, because obviously Mr. Giuliani didn’t know what he was taking about; just forget about the whole thing. If those comments allow some people to dismiss the whole affair and not listen to what Mr. Giuliani had to say, then the comments were invoked to obfuscate the truth.

First, as an electrical engineer, a copy of the hard drive of any laptop is essentially the laptop it was copied from. The only difference would be the firmware used for the processor, but all the data from the original laptop would be present if used on another laptop (or desktop computer.) Therefore to refer to a copy of a laptop hard drive as the laptop itself isn’t muddleheaded; it is an accurate description when speaking of the information.

Does the obfuscation have anything to do with the contents of Hunter Biden’s laptop? Do the videos on the laptop (and the copied hard drives) showing the President’s son engaged in illegal activities have anything to do with it? The contents of the laptop were revealed in 2020 before the election; however the mainstream media decided it was ‘Russian disinformation’ and refused to cover the story – until Joseph Biden had been elected President of the United States. Now the videos filmed by and showing the President’s son smoking crack cocaine and having sex with underage girls are no longer of concern. There are no charges against Hunter Biden for molesting his niece or his use of illegal drugs; it must be a ‘conspiracy theory.’

On the other hand, former Federal prosecutor and New York Mayor (America’s Mayor,) is subjected to ridicule in the media for suggesting the information on the laptop was real. He relates in the interview that while he was defending President Donald Trump from impeachment, the Justice Department accessed his personal data stored in the cloud about the case. The disparity between the treatment accorded Rudy Giuliani and what is supposed to be normal is enormous. Actually, Mr. Giuliani isn’t the only victim. The thought police are out there everyday attempting to silence information and ideas contrary to their worldview and expectations. Remember when some folks decided to start taking down and cancelling Trump supporters for having a different opinion on who they wished to be President?

So, Hunter Biden gets a free ride from molesting his niece (the President’s granddaughter) and smoking crack cocaine while an honorable man is persecuted and reviled.

And I didn’t even mention the billions of dollars Hunter Biden was paid by the Chinese government.

Posted

In the first thirty days of the Joseph R. Biden Jr. administration, the 46th President of the United States did some questionable things.

  1. Though not technically during his administration, the loyalty of American service members was questioned. National Guard troops in Washington were vetted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Pentagon to ascertain whether or not they posed an insider threat to the Inauguration of the 46th President of the United States. I agree with Texas Governor Abbott, “this is the most offensive thing I’ve ever heard“ I also took the oath to serve my country and also find it outrageous.
  2. After signing Executive Orders to open our international borders and roll-back immigration policies of the 45th President, the White House started to discuss domestic travel restrictions as reported by the Miami Herald. Is this helpful to the citizens of the United States of America to let every non-citizen know if they can get across the border, they can stay? Restrict travel by law-abiding citizens, but send the signal to the non-citizen their violation of our laws will go unpunished?
  3. Rocket attacks by Iranian backed militia on US facilities in Irbil, Iraq are rewarded by the Joseph R. Biden administration by signalling the resumption of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, the ‘Iran Deal.’ The death of a US contractor and the wounding of a US service member has no consequence – the Iranian government is clearly allowed to attack and kill Americans with impunity – what happens when they get their nuclear weapons?
  4. In a televised Town Hall, President Joseph R. Biden remarked, “not everybody in the community, in the Hispanic and African American community, particularly in rural areas that are distant and or are in inner city districts know how to use, know how to get online.” I believe this statement is the definition of a racial stereotype. Not only did the press NOT castigate President Joseph R. Biden for his overtly racist statement, the statement went unchallenged.
  5. In the same televised Town Hall when asked about human rights abuses in the Peoples Republic of China, President Joseph R. Biden responded, “culturally there are different norms that each country and their leaders are expected to follow.“ Nothing about how the Chinese Communist Party threw out the agreement with Great Britain about Hong Kong and the freedoms it would enjoy for the agreed upon 50 years. Nothing about the hundreds or thousands of missiles pointed at and threatening Taiwan. Nothing about bulldozing temples, churches and mosques. Nothing about forced human organ harvesting and nothing about the ongoing, well-documented genocide of the Uyghur people. Supposedly, we are to believe these things are just part of Chinese cultural norms. It is very hard to believe such a statement covering the bad behavior of the Chinese Communist Party came out of the mouth of the President of the United States.
In summary, the first thirty days of his administration do not indicate the 46th President of the United States is serving the best interests of the citizens of the United States.
  • Questioning the loyalty of our military members.
  • Placing travel restrictions on Americans, tell the rest of the world the border is open and we won’t send you back.
  • Rewarding Iran for rocket attacks on our overseas bases.
  • Declaring minorities are incapable of using the internet.
  • Ignoring how the world has been declaring the 21st century Uyghur genocide by calling it a ‘cultural norm.’

Lots of folks can say, “he’s not my President.” However, I swore an oath to uphold and defend the US Constitution and Joseph R. Biden was sworn in as the 46th President of the United States on January 20th, 2021. He is the President of all the people of the United States of America whether or not you choose to admit it. He is my President although I did not vote for him or agree with his policies.

Posted

Recently, I posted a video on Fazebook relating the involvement of the Chinese Communist Party in mainstream media manipulation and political corruption.

Often seen on any posting disputing the mainstream media’s positions, these notices cherry pick an item from the video or text and use it to provide a warning of ‘False Information.’ These items include the news mainstream media doesn’t cover or are considered ‘conspiracy theories.’ It would not surprise me to find a ‘False Information’ warning on misspelled words.

The video shared was ‘fact checked’ and deemed ‘False Information.’ The ‘False Information was identified as “US Army Special Forces seized a CIA server in Germany.” Obviously, the ‘fact checker’ did not even listen to the video. Obviously, they are clutching at straws or working from a prepared list because the video says nothing about CIA servers, Special Forces or Germany.

Please listen to the video yourself and see why they are so desperate to sideline this information. Since the video is quite likely to be removed from Youtub, the video can also be accessed from Rumble on this link.

Posted

In a recent link shared on social media I found out that I am racist for owning a dog.
The author’s premise is that White Europeans stole the dogs that had been domesticated in Eurasia over 12,500 years ago. Providing this fact of the supposed heinous act is all the author needs to declare:

These filthy white savages took the work and credit from the Eurasian people and branded these magnificent creatures as their own.
And
If you are white and own a dog, you are openly participating and advocating for cultural appropriation and colonialism. Reinforcing this culture is NOT acceptable and will come with its repercussions.

Perhaps digging a little deeper into history would have informed the author that there were White people living throughout the Eurasian Steppe even before they domesticated dogs. They were Indo-Iranian, a subgroup of the Indo-Europeans. In a quick search I found a domesticated dog jawbone from Iraq dated 12,000 years ago and evidence of domesticated dogs in northern Switzerland 14,000 years ago.
Maybe the real answer has yet to be found, but clearly, this was a case where the conclusion was in search of a premise. A case where a flawed, ill-conceived premise was all that was needed to heap scorn and hatred upon fellow human beings.

Promoting the idea White people are racist for owning dogs (the title of the article,) is sad. It is sad because this human being has been lead to believe all White people are irredeemable parasites; incapable of their own achievements and having to steal from everyone else. If he believes this to be true, why does he also think anyone would believe what he wrote?
This is self loathing nonsense.
Cultures change and evolve. Cultural appropriation is supposed to be some form of crime, yet people learn new ideas and concepts from others making life better for everyone. I was taught imitation was the highest form of flattery; the copiers must find something useful and provide an acknowledgement that someone had a better idea. There is no victim.
As far as “colonialism,” I can only assume he was copying from the standard list of White People’s crimes and forgot to take out the ones that didn’t fit.

btw, will all the Black people owning dogs also be called out for cultural appropriation? What repercussions will they suffer?(asking for a friend)

Posted

I came across this meme:

This is a logical fallacy, implying those who do not support systemic change do not want peace and justice.
Rioting, by definition, is a “violent disturbance of the peace by a crowd.” Therefore, if people want the rioting to end, they do at least want peace.

Obviously, there is also the implied threat the rioting will continue until “systemic change is supported.” You used to hear there was “systemic racism” and now that has morphed into “systemic change.” Let no one be fooled; the system they want to change is our democratic republic. That sounds a lot like they will continue rioting until everyone supports their revolution.

My first reaction is to chuckle to think someone actually believes they can bully the citizens of the US of A into giving up our freedom for empty promises. What ever happened to rational, peaceful discussion? Isn’t violence the last refuge of the incompetent?

To play the victim role and say the only way things change is through revolution is just plain ignorant. Did Martin Luther King Jr achieve nothing? Americans are still free to speak their mind, communicate ideas, and elect representatives to legislative bodies to effect the changes they desire.

The real aim of this meme is to promote the idea you do not have these rights and to convince you revolution is the only path to a hopeful future.

[Subterfuge – deceit used in order to achieve one’s goals.]

A few words about justice-
Since we all have legal avenues to communicate ideas and make changes to the laws; the riots, public destruction and looting are against the law. Justice demands the perpetrators of these crimes be held responsible. Justice also demands an investigation into whether or not the public disturbances were organized acts of sedition.