In earlier posts, we examined one organization’s plan to engage in a conspiracy to remove a duly elected President from office.
A multi-faceted plan to cripple President Trump’s administration featuring:
“resist the normalization of Donald Trump”
“Trump will be defeated either through impeachment or the ballot box in 2020.”
“Trump will be afflicted by a steady flow of damaging information, new revelations, and an inability to avoid conflict situations.”

We also learned members of the opposition party would help provide damaging information:

According to the Majority Staff Report of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs from July 6, 2017, there were 62 leaks damaging to national security in President Trump’s first 126 days. The first starting the morning of his inauguration. As stated in the report, the measure used to qualify the leak as damaging to national security used the 2009 Executive Order (EO13526) by President Obama.

The analysis of the 125 leaks in 126 days in the report also includes those that didn’t jeopardize national security. Of the other 63 leaks, some were too close to call as a release of classified information and the others only attempted to embarrass the President and/or his administration.

When Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) promises a steady flow of damaging information and the US Senate issues a report after four months of steady leaks of information damaging national security, you might say it is a coincidence.

The report mentioned the leaking under President Trump was seven times higher than under Presidents Obama and Bush.
The analysis of the media coverage also indicates that none of the stories targeted the earlier Presidents; whereas every one of the stories covering leaks in the first 126 days of President’s Trump administration were negative.

It has almost been three years since the Senate report was written and yet not a single person has been held accountable for violating the law in leaking information harmful to our national security.
In fact, there has been one long string of damaging information, just as CREW promised. When the furor of one invented scandal subsides, a new one surfaces to maintain the anti-Trump headlines.

---

The next two organizations rounding out the cabal and seeking funding for the campaign to remove the duly elected President of the United States are CREW (Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington) and Shareblue.

CREW is in charge of the legal aspects of the campaign, even boasting of enlisting an army of pro bono lawyers against President Trump and his administration. They also promise “Trump will be afflicted by a steady flow of damaging information, new revelations, and an inability to avoid conflict issues.”

Shareblue promises to take back social media for Democrats, delegitimize Donald Trump’s presidency by emboldening the opposition and empowering the majority of Americans who oppose him. Shareblue has since changed their name to “The American Independent.”

The senior leadership for each of these organizations is provided after each section detailing their plans and capabilities. One might assume they are independent organizations, however, the address for all of these organizations on their 2017 corporate tax filings were the same. The Washington Freebeacon reported North Carolina state records indicate CREW and Media Matters for America share employees and related expenses. See this article.

Media Matters for America and CREW are 501©(3) – tax-free, non-political, non-profit organizations and American Bridge is a Super Political Action Committee. On the other hand, Shareblue or as renamed, The American Independent, is a for-profit organization. With annual budgets in the tens of millions of dollars range, I would hope some scrutiny is focused on how the money is co-mingled. The same scrutiny applied to all organizations with the potential of defrauding the government of the payment of taxes.

I’m not making any accusations of illegal or criminal conduct. It is obvious David Brock and his associates are hyper-partisan hacks bent on a progressive future (which some may characterize as socialist.) They appear to be well organized and well-funded, but only one point should be cause for concern.

Shareblue, now The American Independent and a US media corporation, anticipated “leaks and intel from Democrats on House and Senate committees.”

To summarize:
American Bridge gathered opposition research to feed to Media Matters for America and Shareblue/The American Independent to further share anti-Trump propaganda with other media outlets.

As an ‘independent’ media company, Shareblue/The American Independent was prepared to use the opposition research from American Bridge, information from other progressive groups and leaked information from Democratic congressmen/congresswomen on social media platforms and their web portals “in a daily online persuasion campaign.”

As a ‘non-partisan’ watchdog, CREW, using data from American Bridge, Shareblue/The American Independent and their own research will drive “a steady flow of damaging information, new revelations, and an inability to avoid conflicts.” Also included will be the legal attacks against President Trump’s policies and harassing lawsuits.

Media Matters for America uses information from American Bridge, CREW, and their own efforts to silence conservative voices quickly, before their words can resonate with people.

---

Continuing with the meeting described in post 0001 as part of the media conspiracy to take down a sitting President of the United States. So far we covered Media Matters plan to silence conservative voices in Post 0002. Now it’s time to look at what American Bridge brought to the table in the meeting.

Touting themselves as “The political research engine of the opposition,” American Bridge announced they already had staff hired, Donald Trump’s businesses mapped out and a massive video archive to use.

They also mention:
“Our purpose is to keep Trump unpopular and make it more difficult for candidates who support him to get elected in 2018.”
and
“The mid-term map appears difficult for Democrats; damaging Trump in the next two years could change that.”

In the next four years, American bridge is focused on the following outcomes:
Defeat Trump either through impeachment or at the ballot box in 2020.
Change the balance of power by measurably impacting US Senate, gubernatorial, and state legislative races.
Free ourselves from solely relying on the press. Our robust digital program will reach voters directly online.

Further on:
American Bridge will sustain a nonstop campaign against Trump, his administration, and Republicans who enable him.

They later explain their 2017 budget is $14.7 million to cover it’s operations and a Super PAC with a staff of 146 people. They also plan to create an anti-Trump war room of 25 researchers and a communication team of 16 people to feed their information to the press, do rapid response to unfavorable stories and have six folks as dedicated media monitors.

Media Matters signs up to aggressively attack and silence conservative voices.
American Bridge signs up to provide opposition research and use it to:
1. Feed negative stories to the press
2. Monitor media for unfavorable news and information
3. Provide rapid response (damage control) to counter the unfavorable news and information.

Did their non-stop plan to seed news programs with negative stories succeed?
If you didn’t notice over 90% of Donald Trump’s news coverage was negative since he announced he was running for President, you may have been asleep.

---

So, we have this meeting described in the previous posting. Let’s dive a little deeper:

Media Matters was at the meeting if not running the show.
The organization was formed in 2004 and is targeted at silencing what they term as ‘conservative misinformation’ (or any conservative opinion.) As noted in wikipedia, the organization is engaged in a war on Fox News.

In the Media Matters portion of the document, it mentions they “secured access to raw data from Facebook, Twitter, and other social media sites.” Their plan is “to develop technologies and processes to systematically monitor and analyze this unfiltered data.” “The earlier we identify a fake news story, the more effectively we can quash it.”

Here are some more:
“Serial misinformers and right-wing propagandists inhabiting everything from social media to the highest levels of government will be exposed.”

“Internet and social media platforms, like Google and Facebook, will no longer uncritically and without consequence host and enrich fake news sites and propagandists.”

“Toxic alt-right social media-fueled harassment campaigns that silence dissent and poison our national discourse will be punished and halted.”

Although our Bill of Rights promises the freedom of speech, Media Matters considers itself the judge of what speech should be allowed. Nestled in the pages of the handout from the meeting are examples of how they took away Donald Trump’s phone interview privileges on numerous cable news channels because he was getting too much publicity, or removing Roger Stone from appearing on cable news, or pulling Glenn Beck off of cable news or ‘holding 60 Minutes accountable for its faulty Benghazi reporting.’

Has any portion of their plan come to fruition or is it not a conspiracy?
First, this information came from a “Private & Confidential” document, so by definition 2 of the word ‘conspiracy’, Media Matters engaged in a surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons for a secret purpose.

2. an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons; plot.

Has there been any evidence conservative voices have been silenced?
Yes, and ignoring the banning of conservatives on social media platforms for “violating community standards” is an unhelpful excuse. Facebook labeled the Declaration of Independence as ‘hate speech’, Twitter and Facebook have banned people for life due to their thoughts and ideas.

So, it can be shown Media Matters engaged in a not-so-successful conspiracy to silence conservative voices.

Next we look at American Bridge, “The political research engine of the opposition.”

---

First post.
Nice to start off with a bang.
So, there is/was no conspiracy to take down a sitting President?
If the actions described in the following posts fails to convince you, you obviously have a blind spot.
Stand tight, this won’t be tiny sound bites

What is a conspiracy?
According to the dictionary:
1. the act of conspiring.
2. an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons; plot.
3. a combination of persons for a secret, unlawful, or evil purpose: He joined the conspiracy to overthrow the government.
4. Law. an agreement by two or more persons to commit a crime, fraud, or other wrongful act.
5. any concurrence in action; combination in bringing about a given result.

Let’s start with the media’s support for the conspiracy.
First, a meeting held in Florida at the end of January 2017. Same weekend that Donald Trump was inaugurated as President of the United States.

Presented at the meeting was a pdf with the plan to:
“resist the normalization of Donald Trump”
“Trump will be defeated either through impeachment or the ballot box in 2020.”
“Trump will be afflicted by a steady flow of damaging information, new revelations, and an inability to avoid conflict situations.”

Imagine that these notes were written even before Donald Trump served a single minute in office.

Here’s a link to an article with a link to the private and confidential handout. It is very interesting reading.

In case the original is censored by someone, a copy of “Read the Confidential David Brock Memo Outlining Plans to Attack Trump is available.”
And, if they took down the pdf, get it here

---