I am not joined at the hip to any political party. To me, if someone does the crime – they should do the time as required by law and the findings of the judge and jury. Nobody should be above the law, even though there are glaring examples (1) , (2).

It appears to me that all too often people are willing to give other members of their ‘tribe’ a pass on activities they would gladly send non-members to a life sentence in prison. Rather than challenge the groupthink, these folks would rather stay with the program and rationalize the illegal actions as a necessary evil to overcome the opposition and maintain the agenda. Are all of them aware of the real agenda or is it some fanciful story of obfuscation?
There are clear, concrete indications of corruption and somehow it gets a pass because it is labeled ‘politics.’

Examples include:

• Life-long politicians whose net worth is thousands times more than their yearly salary.
• The son of a sitting US President having shady business dealings with representatives of foreign governments – documented evidence, not hearsay. I don’t care about the prostitutes and drug use evidence – I care about the payments to ‘the big guy’ from foreign governments.
• US Government interacting with social media platforms to control information.

And of course, these have been labeled ‘conspiracy theories’ and the mainstream media has continued to downplay or even ignore the evidence. A recent study published on the National Institute of Health’s website https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9610448/ outlines (and provides copious data to show) how Big Pharma copied what Big Tobacco did to manipulate the data. From the Background portion of the article:

The COVID-19 period highlights a huge problem that has been developing for decades, the control of science by industry. In the 1950s, the tobacco industry set the example, which the pharmaceutical industry followed. Since then, the latter has been regularly condemned for illegal marketing, misrepresentation of experimental results, dissimulation of information about the dangers of drugs, and considered as criminal. Therefore, this study was conducted to show that knowledge is powerfully manipulated by harmful corporations, whose goals are: 1/financial; 2/to suppress our ability to make choices to acquire global control of public health.

This was published back in October 2022 and where was the outrage? Why didn’t more people know about this?
The US government is mandating vaccines while the experts at the National Institute of Health are getting $350 million a year from Big Pharma. Any information contrary to their narrative is censored on social media through the efforts of US government officials as shown in the recent Twitter Files release. One might wonder what the emails from mainstream media outlets might reveal if examined by an independent third party.

It is high time to hold these people accountable for their actions. Forget their political affiliation, any and all of them should be investigated.
Do you know where your tribe is leading you?

For $30 you can have one of these fashionable ball caps.
What more evidence is necessary to demonstrate the two-tiered justice system currently in vogue in the US of A?
Not only that, this former candidate openly flouts the fact the Department of Justice is unwilling to prosecute her for improper handling of classified materials or ignoring Congressional subpoenas.

“But Her Emails” is a dog-whistle showing her contempt for average Americans.
Only she can brag about not being held accountable, as though she is above the law.

Her ideological opponents are routinely raided and publicly arrested, like the SWAT team who took down Roger Stone, the raids on Rudy Giuliani’s home and office, the very public arrest of Dr. Peter Navarro at the airport, and the raid on Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home to name a few.

But she can sell ball caps mocking the raid on former President Trump’s home.
If this is no big deal to you, then wait until you fall into a category that places a target on your back and the full weight of the law comes crashing down on you, while she openly flouts her immunity from prosecution.

ps I believe the “Lock Her Up” chants can be saved for after she is found guilty after standing trial(s).

An American citizen has been caught with marijuana in Russia where it is illegal.
On one side of the issue, some folks want to make a prisoner swap to bring her back to the US. Involved in the trade is this WNBA star and another US citizen for an arms dealer and Putin ally, some call the merchant of death.
On the other side, some criticize the WNBA star for not paying proper respect for the US flag during the Olympics and elsewhere and others criticize the supposed trade because the arms dealer is responsible for the deaths of thousands, including members of the US armed forces.
Some members of the first group accuse members of the second group of being racists while glossing over the fact the US is engaged in a proxy war against Russia, the countless number of people in the US in jail for marijuana possession, the real possibility the ‘merchant of death’ will help murder more Americans if freed and the WNBA star was familiar with Russian laws concerning marijuana possession.
I believe their accusations of racism are disingenuous – why should the WNBA star get a free pass when so many are in jail here in the US, especially when she was familiar with Russian law?
I am not against freeing American citizens incarcerated abroad, but to call comments against her release racist is just a way to silence different opinions. It is meant to be the final word in the discussion because someone doesn’t have a better argument to counter a different point of view. Demonizing opposing viewpoints might make that someone feel like they won the argument when in actuality it just demonstrates how weak and feckless that position really is.

This is the start of a list of information missing from the J6 Congressional Select Committee Hearings:

1. Answers to the questions:
• If Donald Trump wanted to incite violence that fateful day, as his critics suggest, then why did he order the Pentagon to have a large military force ready to quell a disturbance?
• Why did a Democrat-led Congress turn down the assistance of National Guard troops in the face of intelligence warnings about violence?
• Who opened the massive magnetically locked doors (pass code protected) from the inside to allow the protestors access to the Capitol?
• Who is Roy Epps, was he paid by US government officials to be there, and why do left-wing publications single out this one “Trump supporter” as a victim?
• How many paid confidential informants were present at the request of US government officials and who requested their attendance?
• Why are the only Republicans on the Committee known to have a virulent hatred of Donald J. Trump? Why were members of the body appointed by the minority leader not seated?
• Why are the witnesses in the hearings not subject to cross-examination? (ref: US Constitution Amendment VI)
• When did it become acceptable for anonymous witnesses under US jurisprudence? (ref: US Constitution Amendment VI)
• When did it become acceptable for hearsay and/or rumors in a congressional hearing?
2. The names and departments of government employees present in the crowd at the US Capitol as part of their official duties. (American citizens are paying their salaries, we are entitled to know what they are doing.)
3. A rebuttal, any rebuttal to the testimony presented in the hearings.

Recently, I saw the following posted by a candidate for public office on social media.

Obviously a knee-jerk reaction to the comments by actor Matthew McConaughey at the White House on the Uvalde shooting and the reason this candidate no longer has my support.

Also obvious is someone failed to listen to Mr. McConaughey’s speech/talk or the follow-up on FoxNews with Brett Baier before jumping to a conclusion.

What I garnered from her post is:

1. All actors are to be ignored because they they don’t represent real Americans and are probably communists.
2. Anyone who mentions gun control is to be immediately shouted down, regardless of their position.
3. Anything you might disagree with must be slapped down as soon as possible with as much vigor as you can muster.

I guess I am one of those folks who remembers when those elected to political office actually served their constituents by attempting to find common ground with the other party. Those elected to political office actually treated fellow citizens with respect and dignity and worked to find solutions to the problems facing our nation. The elected realized they worked for us and not some ideology only some of their constituents followed.

The United States does not need politicians who represent only a portion of their constituents. Or that foment hatred towards the opposition.
Neither side is blameless and any excuse to continue such behavior is dereliction of their oath of office and total BS. All the people who put you in office want you to serve them instead of getting on a soap box and pontificating – get over your cheap self and act like you care about the people and our nation.

To be perfectly honest, the continuation of demonizing political opponents is splitting the country and no matter which side you stand on, the other side will still be there with the same rights and responsibilities as you enjoy (unless they are all killed or put in prison.) That agenda supports America’s enemies because it keeps us divided and unable to work together for a brighter future for our children and grandchildren.